Meetings
Policy and advocacy contacts who agreed to talk with the CEO.
Clause Out is a Copenhagen startup whose platform lets U.S. citizens vote on real bills and turns the results into reports for Congress and data for advocacy groups. We ran LinkedIn outreach from the CEO's profile to U.S. policy and public affairs leaders, tested nine opening messages, and turned the replies into 38 positive conversations.
Results from the CEO's LinkedIn outreach report over 6 months.
Policy and advocacy contacts who agreed to talk with the CEO.
Conversations started with U.S. policy and advocacy people.
Replies that led to a meeting or asked to hear more.
U.S. policy, public affairs and advocacy people added to the CEO's network.
In the third round of tests we compared a direct request for a 20-minute chat with an offer to share the company's policy newsletter. The low-pressure offer drew more replies, and almost twice the share of them were interested.
Interest rate is the share of replies that showed interest, per message version: 2 of 6 replies for the chat request and 8 of 13 for the newsletter offer.
Clause Out is based in Copenhagen, but its buyers are U.S. advocacy groups, interest groups and the people who work on policy for them. These professionals spend much of their time keeping up with policy developments, and public opinion data is often too slow or too costly for them to use.
The goal: start real conversations with U.S. policy professionals and find the first pilot users.
We sent personal connection requests from the CEO's profile to directors, VPs and heads of policy, public affairs and government affairs, with a focus on people who had worked in Congress. Over three rounds we tested nine opening messages, from a mission-led pitch to messages about the real work of cutting through policy information.
The tests showed that strategic policy roles gave the best conversations and most of the meetings, while very small companies and solo consultants rarely fit. Softer asks worked better than a direct meeting request, and an offer to share the company's newsletter started the most interested conversations.
Over 6 months, 612 policy and advocacy contacts accepted the CEO's request and 78 replied. 38 of those replies were positive: 24 people asked for more information or showed interest, and 14 became meetings.
14 meetings with U.S. policy and advocacy professionals.
A launch in month 1, three rounds of message tests through month 5, and the last replies in month 6.
A strategy workshop to map buyers and partners: advocacy groups, policy and public affairs leaders, lobbyists and former congressional staff across the U.S.
Outreach went live from the CEO's profile with three opening messages. Month 1 brought 84 new connections and 17 replies.
Two more rounds of message tests, a shift from a mission pitch to the daily problem of following policy, and a newsletter offer that lifted interest to 62% of replies.
2,276 requests, 612 new connections, 78 replies, 38 positive conversations and 14 meetings.
New connections and replies for months 1 to 5, with the share of new connections who replied.
CEO's profile, by month.
How we count. Months are counted from launch. Requests, new connections and replies come from the monthly outreach report for the CEO's profile, which holds figures for months 1 to 5; month 6 was logged as individual replies only, so it is not shown in the chart. Acceptance rate is new connections divided by requests. Reply rate is replies divided by new connections, for each month and for the total. Positive conversations, interested contacts and meetings are the totals recorded in the final report. The message test rates are the share of replies that showed interest for each message version.
Tell us who you sell to, and we will show you how we would reach them.